Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 338 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 336 Guest(s) Bing, Google
|
Latest Threads |
Fr. Hewko's Sermons: St. ...
Forum: August 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
Yesterday, 09:50 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 57
|
Apologia pro Marcel Lefeb...
Forum: Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 08:40 AM
» Replies: 33
» Views: 9,324
|
Dr. Carol Byrne: A Series...
Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 08:05 AM
» Replies: 152
» Views: 459,062
|
The Love of Eternal Wisdo...
Forum: Resources Online
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 07:54 AM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 1,055
|
Fr. Hewko's Sermons: St. ...
Forum: August 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
08-10-2025, 10:37 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 97
|
The Catholic Trumpet - Fr...
Forum: The Catholic Trumpet
Last Post: Stone
08-10-2025, 06:57 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 110
|
Ninth Sunday after Pentec...
Forum: Pentecost
Last Post: Stone
08-10-2025, 06:28 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 16,567
|
August 10th – Saint Laure...
Forum: August
Last Post: Stone
08-10-2025, 06:20 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 6,794
|
Leo XIII against Leo XIV ...
Forum: Pope Leo XIV
Last Post: Stone
08-10-2025, 06:18 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 78
|
Fr. Hewko Sermons: "St. ...
Forum: August 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
08-09-2025, 11:06 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 94
|
|
|
Ecumenical Catholic parish celebrates ‘ordination’ of female Episcopal ‘priest’ |
Posted by: Stone - 06-09-2025, 07:33 AM - Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism
- No Replies
|
 |
Ecumenical Catholic parish celebrates ‘ordination’ of female Episcopal ‘priest’
The Catholic Diocese of Richmond's Church of the Holy Apostles hosted the February 'ordination' of Marie Kirk-Clunan.
Anglican church altar
Lucian Coman/Shutterstock
Jun 6, 2025
VIRGINIA BEACH, Virginia (LifeSiteNews) — A Catholic parish that serves as an ecumenical parish with the Episcopal (Anglican) community allowed the ‘ordination’ of a female Episcopal “priest” inside the shared worship space and then accepted her as co-pastor.
Church of the Holy Apostles, a Roman Catholic parish that also serves an Episcopal worship community, allowed the February “ordination” of the Episcopalian Marie Kirk-Clunan to take place in the sanctuary and has permitted her to serve as the co-pastor of the parish since her “ordination.” The Diocese of Richmond’s Bishop Barry Knestout previously granted permission for Episcopalians to “consecrate” a female “bishop” in another Catholic parish.
Images from a parish Facebook post commemorating Kirk-Clunan’s “ordination” show that she was “ordained” by a female Episcopal “bishop.” One of the pictures shows the Catholic chaplain of the chapel, Monsignor Raphael Peprah, attending the ceremony.
The Catholic Church teaches that it is impossible for women to receive validly the sacrament of holy orders. The Church also teaches that Episcopalians and other “ecclesial communities derived from the Reformation” do not have valid holy orders at all because of broken apostolic succession. They can neither confect the Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist nor give absolution for sins.
In addition to claiming to “ordain” women as “priests,” the Episcopal Church recognizes same-sex “marriage” and LGBT gender ideology.
READ: Female Anglican bishop ‘concelebrates’ Mass with Catholic priests
LifeSiteNews reached out to both Msgr. Peprah’s and Bishop Knestout’s offices for comment but did not receive a response from either as of publication time.
Just before the start of a February 16 Sunday worship service (viewable below) that featured a Catholic Mass immediately followed by Kirk-Clunan’s first Episcopal “Eucharist” as a “priest,” a laywoman reading parish announcements congratulated the Episcopalian on her “ordination.” There followed immediate applause from the ecumenical congregation. The announcer also encouraged the congregants to stay for both liturgies to promote “Christian unity.”
Holy Apostles Church was founded as an ecumenical parish in 1977 to serve as a “visible sign of Christian unity.” The parish has a Catholic priest serving as a chaplain and a Episcopalian who serves as co-pastor; it is officially part of both the Roman Catholic Diocese of Richmond and the Episcopal Diocese of Southern Virginia.
READ: Catholic college allows female Anglican ‘priests’ to celebrate ‘Eucharist’ inside basilica
The church regularly has one worship service that includes a Catholic Mass and an Episcopal “Eucharist,” and parishioners are always encouraged to remain for both liturgies.
In 2020, Bishop Knestout granted permission for the Episcopal Church to “ordain” a female “bishop” in one of the diocese’s churches, St. Bede Church in Williamsburg. Following backlash from the Catholic faithful, the bishop and the then-pastor of St. Bede, Monsignor Joseph P. Lehman, released letters defending the decision, citing ecumenism. Lehman notably also called the event a “consecration” despite the Church’s stance on the invalidity of women’s and Protestants’ “Holy Orders.”
READ: Catholic bishop defends allowing ‘ordination’ of Episcopalian female ‘bishop’ inside Catholic church
The Episcopal Church responded to the backlash by relocating the “consecration” due to the “dismay and distress” their plans caused the Catholic faithful in the Diocese of Richmond.
|
|
|
It has been nearly 100 years since Our Lady asked Catholics to honor the First Saturday of every mon |
Posted by: Stone - 06-06-2025, 09:12 AM - Forum: Our Lady
- No Replies
|
 |
It has been nearly 100 years since Our Lady asked Catholics to honor the First Saturday of every month
December marks 100 years since Our Lady asked for the First Saturday Devotion in reparation for sins against Her Immaculate Heart.
With seven Saturdays remaining, the time to act is now.
Our Lady of Fatima statue of the image, Our Lady of the Rosary of Fatima, Blessed Virgin Mary
Sidney de Almeida/Shutterstock
Jun 5, 2025
(LifeSiteNews) — The First Saturday of the month is nearly upon us again, and Catholics are reminded to observe the practices of the First Saturday Devotion in reparation for sins against the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
What is the First Saturday devotion?
There are great promises attached to this devotion, both for the world, and for individuals. Our Lady said to Sr. Lucy, one of the three seers of Fatima:
I promise to assist at the hour of death with all the graces necessary for salvation.
To obtain this grace, on the first Saturday of five consecutive months, Catholics must each month fulfil the following four conditions, made in reparation to the Immaculate Heart:
- Go to Confession
- Receive Holy Communion
- Pray five decades of the Rosary
- Meditate for 15 minutes on the Rosary mysteries (in addition to the Rosary)
There are only seven First Saturdays left until December 10, which will mark 100 years since Our Lady requested this devotion of Sr. Lucy.
Before we consider the providential concessions made by Heaven for those unable to fulfill the conditions on the First Saturday itself, let us see more about how and when this devotion was revealed.
How it was revealed
In 1917, Our Lady revealed three “secrets” to the three shepherd children of Fatima, including a vision of Hell and a prophecy of war, persecution of the Church, and many other chastisements for the sins of men.
“To forestall this,” She said, “I shall come to ask for the Consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart and the Communion of Reparation on the First Saturdays.”
She added that if Her requests were fulfilled, Russia would be converted; otherwise the promised chastisements would occur.
On December 10, 1925, Our Lady returned to Lucy – then a Dorothean postulant in the convent – and delivered the formal request She had foretold in 1917.
It was then that Our Lady revealed the astounding promise attached to the devotion. Sr. Lucy recounts the words of the Blessed Virgin, Who showed her a heart encircled by thorns:
Quote:Look My daughter, at My Heart, surrounded with thorns with which ungrateful men pierce Me at every moment by their blasphemies and ingratitude.
You at least try to console Me and announce in My name that I promise to assist at the moment of death, with all the graces necessary for salvation, all those who, on the first Saturday of five consecutive months, shall confess, receive Holy Communion, recite five decades of the Rosary, and keep Me company for fifteen minutes while meditating on the fifteen mysteries of the Rosary, with the intention of making reparation to Me.
Heaven’s generosity towards the faithful
In a locution with Our Lord on February 15, 1926, Sr. Lucy appealed on behalf of those who find it difficult to confess on the First Saturday itself and asked if this Confession could be made “within eight days.” Our Lord replied:
Quote:Yes. It can even be made later on, provided that the souls are in the state of grace when they receive Me on the first Saturday, and that they had the intention of making reparation to the Sacred Heart of Mary.
Our Lord also told her that if penitents forget to form this intention, “They can form it at the next confession, taking advantage of their first opportunity to go to confession.”
At a later date, in 1930, Our Lord even told Sr. Lucy that “the practice of this devotion will be equally acceptable on the Sunday following the first Saturday when My priests, for a just cause, allow it to souls.”
Sr. Lucy was also told that the five First Saturdays were linked to “five types of offenses and blasphemies committed against the Immaculate Heart of Mary”:- Blasphemies against the Immaculate Conception.
- Blasphemies against Her Virginity.
- Blasphemies against her Divine Maternity, in refusing at the same time to recognize Her as the Mother of men.
- The blasphemies of those who publicly seek to sow in the hearts of children indifference or scorn, or even hatred of this Immaculate Mother.
- The offenses of those who outrage Her directly in Her holy images.
Implications for the world
This devotion also has implications beyond the individuals who practice it. Sr. Lucy wrote in March 1939:
Quote:Whether the world has war or peace depends on the practice of this devotion, along with the consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. This is why I desire its propagation so ardently, especially because this is also the will of our dear Mother in Heaven.
In June of the same year, she wrote:
Quote:Our Lady promised to delay the scourge of war, if this devotion was propagated and practiced. We see that She will obtain remission of this chastisement to the extent that efforts are made to propagate this devotion; but I fear that we cannot do any more than we are doing and that God, being displeased, will pull back the arm of His mercy and let the world be ravaged by this chastisement which will be unlike any other in the past, horrible, horrible.
War was declared two months after this statement.
The centennial
As the centennial of Our Lady’s request approaches in December, we cannot help but notice the words of Our Lady and Our Lord about the later request, in 1929, for the Pope and all the bishops to consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart.
As Sr. Lucy struggled to have this request taken seriously, Heaven compared the reluctance of the hierarchy to that of Louis XIV, the King of France, who failed to consecrate France to the Sacred Heart. She received at least four separate messages making this comparison.
What was meant by this comparison? St. Margaret Mary Alacoque received this request in 1689 and relayed it to the court. Louis XIV and his successors failed to comply. In 1789, the French Revolution began – bringing the ancien régime of the French monarchy to an end. Louis XVI was beheaded in 1793.
While the First Saturday request is distinct from the later request for the Consecration of Russia, both are presented in the Fatima message as essential means to prevent chastisement and obtain peace.
We can leave aside the question of whether Russia has been consecrated, and observe that most Catholics do not practice the First Saturday devotion.
Now is the time to start. We have seven First Saturdays left before the centenary in December. The next First Saturday falls on June 7, 2025. Catholics who begin then will have completed the devotion by December.
Despite its simplicity, this devotion is perhaps the most urgent call Heaven has made to the faithful in the last hundred years.
All texts taken from Frère Michel’s, The Whole Truth about Fatima, Vol. II.
|
|
|
Vatican II’s Dignitatis Humanae and the June Battle of Flags |
Posted by: Stone - 06-06-2025, 09:06 AM - Forum: Articles by Catholic authors
- No Replies
|
 |
Vatican II’s Dignitatis Humanae and the June Battle of Flags
Robert Morrison | June 4, 2025
Were it not for Dignitatis Humanae, there would be no supposed theological justification for this demand that human dignity requires us to refrain from questioning the “transness” of those claiming to practice the Catholic Faith. Thanks in large part to the defenders of Vatican II, though, Fr. Martin and the New Ways Ministry can insist that Catholics ought to celebrate Pride Month in recognition of the human dignity of the Catholic LGBTQ community.
As reported by LifeSite, Fr. James Martin recently shared his opinion about why Catholics ought to celebrate “Pride Month”:
Quote:“Can Catholics celebrate Pride Month, when the LGBTQ community marks its place in society? . . . Can they do this when pride is one of the traditional seven deadly sins? Isn’t it wrong to show pride? First, it’s important to remember that there are (at least) two kinds of pride. The first is the satisfaction that can come from your own accomplishments. This can turn into vanity, which is something to avoid. . . . So the first kind of pride can be a threat to humility, to discipleship and to the spiritual life overall. But the second kind of pride is a consciousness of one’s own dignity. And that’s closer to what Pride Month is meant to be for the LGBTQ community: a recognition of the human dignity of a group of people who have, for centuries been, treated with contempt, rejection and violence.”
So whereas Martin acknowledges that there is a concept of sin, he asserts that Pride Month is sinless because it is based on recognizing the human dignity of the people within the LGBTQ community. He also opined that Pride Month is complementary to the celebration of the Sacred Heart of Jesus:
Quote:“Another objection is marking Pride Month during the same month that Catholics celebrate the Month of the Sacred Heart. But, as I see it, the two are complementary, not contradictory. The Sacred Heart teaches us how Jesus loves; Pride Month reminds us whom Jesus invite us to love today.”
Thus, if we are to take Fr. Martin’s views at face value, we would have to conclude that God wants us to love the LGTBQ community by celebrating the human dignity of its members. As discussed below, this is entirely consistent with Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Freedom, Dignitatis Humanae. As a preliminary matter, though, Martin’s views invite us to review what the Catholic Church actually teaches about how the Sacred Heart of Jesus calls us to love today.
Devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and True Catholic Love
Fr. John Croiset summarized devotion to the Sacred Heart as follows in his 1691 book, The Devotion to the Sacred Heart:
Quote:“From what has been said so far, it is easy to see what is meant by the devotion to the Sacred Heart: by this devotion we mean the ardent love which we conceive for Jesus Christ at the remembrance of all the marvels which He has wrought to show His tender love for us, especially in the Sacrament of the Eucharist, which is the miracle of His love; we mean the keen regret which we feel at the sight of the outrages which men commit against Jesus Christ in this adorable Mystery; we mean the ardent desire which presses us to leave nothing undone to make reparation for these outrages by every possible means. That is what we mean by devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and that is what it consists in.” (p. 55)
So we love Jesus for all that He has done to show His great love for us; and we do all we can to make reparation for the offenses that people commit against Our Lord, particularly offenses against Jesus in the Holy Eucharist. As all Catholics with the use of reason should know, receiving Holy Communion in a state of mortal sin is undoubtedly high on the list of most evil outrages against the Sacred Heart. Accordingly, an important component of reparation to the Sacred Heart involves opposition to any sinful lifestyles that naturally promote sacrilegious Communions.
Fr. Croiset also wrote of the necessary dispositions for devotion to the Sacred Heart, including a great horror of sin:
Quote:“As the end of devotion to the Sacred Heart is none other than a very ardent and tender love for Jesus Christ, it is evident that to have this devotion one must be in the state of grace, and have an extreme horror of every kind of sin incompatible with this love. The Sacred Heart being the source of all purity, nothing sullied can even enter It. Whatever we may say or do for His love and for His glory, if we do not live in the state of grace, is devoid of supernatural merit.” (p. 97)
We can see from this that one of the greatest conceivable offenses against the Sacred Heart of Jesus would be for apparent shepherds of the Catholic Church to encourage Catholics to remain in a state of mortal sin. Conversely, one of the greatest acts of love and reparation to the Sacred Heart would be to charitably encourage souls to abandon the sins that keep them from remaining in the state of grace.
Blessed Columba Marmion elaborated on this latter point in his Christ, the Life of the Soul:
Quote:“To love is to ‘wish good’ to someone, says St. Thomas; but every specific good is subordinated to the supreme good. That is why giving God, the Infinite Good, to those who do not know Him, by instructing them, is so pleasing to God. It is the same with praying for the conversion of unbelievers, of sinners, that they may arrive at faith or recover divine grace.” (p. 462)
If we truly love our neighbor, we must want them to abandon sin so that they may “arrive at faith or recover divine grace.” We know from this that anyone purporting to be a Catholic who encouraged others to remain in sin would actually be spreading hate rather than love.
As we can read from the words of Fr. Martin, though, he has essentially arrived at the exact opposite position — his views are an inversion of the Catholic truths expressed so well by Fr. Croiset, Dom Marmion, and every other Catholic who has written accurately on the topic.
Vatican II’s Dignitatis Humanae as the “Theological” Foundation of Fr. Martin’s Error
As we can read in his September 1965 intervention read at the Second Vatican Council, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre expressed concerns that the Declaration of Religious Liberty, Dignitatis Humanae, could lead to the inversion of Catholic teaching that we see today from Fr. Martin:
Quote:“The dignity of the human person is acquired by observing the divine law. He who despises the divine law thereby loses his dignity. Do the damned still preserve their dignity in hell? It is impossible to speak with veracity of liberty, of conscience, of the dignity of the human person except by reference to divine law. This observance of divine law is the criterion of human dignity. Man, the family, civil society, possess dignity in the measure in which they respect the divine law. Divine law itself indicates to us the rules for the right use of our liberty. Divine law itself marks out the limits of constraint permitted to the authorities established by God. Divine law itself gives the measure of religious liberty.” (from Archbishop Lefebvre’s I Accuse the Council!, p. 64)
Once human dignity is divorced from observance of divine law, then those who promote sin will clamor for men to celebrate the dignity of their sinful lifestyles. Tragically, the passage upon which Archbishop Lefebvre commented in his intervention remained largely unchanged in the final version of Dignitatis Humanae:
Quote:“The council further declares that the right to religious freedom has its foundation in the very dignity of the human person as this dignity is known through the revealed word of God and by reason itself. . . It is in accordance with their dignity as persons — that is, beings endowed with reason and free will and therefore privileged to bear personal responsibility — that all men should be at once impelled by nature and also bound by a moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth. They are also bound to adhere to the truth, once it is known, and to order their whole lives in accord with the demands of truth. However, men cannot discharge these obligations in a manner in keeping with their own nature unless they enjoy immunity from external coercion as well as psychological freedom. Therefore the right to religious freedom has its foundation not in the subjective disposition of the person, but in his very nature. In consequence, the right to this immunity continues to exist even in those who do not live up to their obligation of seeking the truth and adhering to it and the exercise of this right is not to be impeded, provided that just public order be observed.”
Although this language from the Conciliar declaration speaks of the need for people to seek the truth, it also states that their human dignity is not impaired by their failure to seek truth. Moreover, the declaration makes the astounding claim that human dignity requires that those in error “enjoy immunity from external coercion as well as psychological freedom.” If we read this to mean that a person cannot be forced to become Catholic, it is obviously true. But the Vatican II architects drafted this language to be broad and ambiguous enough to mean that we cannot attempt to persuade those in sin to abandon their sinful lifestyles — such would be impermissible psychological coercion.
We know from sixty years of painful experience that the defenders of Vatican II cannot admit that the declaration’s language could possibly leave open the interpretations about which Archbishop Lefebvre warned. However, we merely have to read the way in which the New Ways Ministry attacked Francis’s Dignitatis Infinita (for being disrespectful to transgender people) to see that Archbishop Lefebvre was exactly right:
Quote:“Exploring our transness and living our trans lives in response to a moral or spiritual conviction is a part our search for and response to (what we have found to be) truth. In this respect, it is part of the process whereby we pursue a morally dignified life, in accordance with our nature and obligation as free beings. Moreover, the Church also teaches that we cannot exercise our freedom in accordance with our nature and duty if we are coerced in doing so. And this is the case even if human freedom might also need to be ‘freed’ to stop it making mistakes in that search. This is the principle that underpins the Church’s affirmation of religious freedom (Dignitatis Humanae, §2) – which applies even to bad and/or mistaken people.”
Were it not for Dignitatis Humanae, there would be no supposed theological justification for this demand that human dignity requires us to refrain from questioning the “transness” of those claiming to practice the Catholic Faith. Thanks in large part to the defenders of Vatican II, though, Fr. Martin and the New Ways Ministry can insist that Catholics ought to celebrate Pride Month in recognition of the human dignity of the Catholic LGBTQ community.
But Catholics do not have to surrender this battle of June flags. Even those who want to continue defending Vatican II can oppose the anti-Catholic errors that the Council’s architects promoted through their ambiguous passages. However, this requires Catholics to speak truth in the face of wicked lies. The reality is that Fr. Martin is directing hate speech against the Sacred Heart of Jesus and those souls for whom He shed His Precious Blood. The best way for us to love Fr. Martin and those who share his views is to charitably insist that they stop lying, and encourage them to make reparation for their sins.
Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us!
Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us!
|
|
|
|