Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 345 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 340 Guest(s) Applebot, Bing, Google, Yandex, All for Mary
|
Latest Threads |
Bishop Strickland calls o...
Forum: General Commentary
Last Post: Stone
1 hour ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 15
|
Beware the “Conservative ...
Forum: The Catholic Trumpet
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 10:37 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 111
|
Fr. Hewko's Sermons: Cath...
Forum: April 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
04-29-2025, 09:21 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 115
|
Louis Veuillot: The Liber...
Forum: Uncompromising Fighters for the Faith
Last Post: Stone
04-29-2025, 12:09 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 294
|
Mark Carney wins Canadian...
Forum: Global News
Last Post: Stone
04-29-2025, 12:01 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 99
|
Francis Was a Faithful So...
Forum: Pope Francis
Last Post: Stone
04-29-2025, 12:00 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 108
|
Fr. Hewko's Sermons: "The...
Forum: April 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
04-28-2025, 08:03 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 127
|
Feast Day of St. Louis de...
Forum: The Saints
Last Post: Our Lady of Fatima Chapel
04-28-2025, 12:21 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 167
|
Fr. Ruiz: LA IGLESIA MILI...
Forum: Fr. Ruiz's Sermons April 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
04-28-2025, 12:14 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 130
|
Fr. Ruiz: Recommended art...
Forum: Rev. Father Hugo Ruiz Vallejo
Last Post: Stone
04-28-2025, 07:48 AM
» Replies: 74
» Views: 151,789
|
|
|
Bishop Strickland calls on Cardinal Farrell to recuse himself from the conclave |
Posted by: Stone - 1 hour ago - Forum: General Commentary
- No Replies
|
 |
Bishop Strickland calls on Cardinal Farrell to recuse himself from the conclave
Cardinal Kevin Farrell's ties to the Legionaries of Christ and ex-cardinal McCarrick
– both linked to major abuse scandals – are cause for deep concern.
Bishop Joseph Strickland
YouTube/Screenshot
Apr 30, 2025
(LifeSiteNews) — In these critical days, as the eyes of the faithful turn toward Rome with concern and hope, it becomes the solemn duty of every shepherd of souls to speak with clarity, guided not by fear or favor, but by the light of the Gospel and fidelity to the Bride of Christ.
It is with a heavy heart that I must address the troubling circumstances surrounding Cardinal Kevin Farrell. His longstanding ties to the Legionaries of Christ – a congregation whose founder was guilty of egregious crimes and abuses – are already a cause for deep concern. Cardinal Farrell’s administrative role within that community during those years, especially in the financial domain, raises questions that have never received sufficient public clarification.
Yet even more disturbing is his close association with former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick. It is well known that Cardinal Farrell was not merely acquainted with McCarrick but was chosen by him as a trusted associate. The faithful cannot ignore the profound gravity of this connection, especially in light of the criminal and moral depravity now revealed in McCarrick’s case. Victims of abuse, and indeed all Catholics who seek transparency and justice, rightly ask how such an alliance could have remained unchallenged for so long.
Since 2019, Cardinal Farrell has held the office of Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church, a role of great influence in the governance of the Church during a sede vacante and in the preparation of a conclave. In that capacity, Cardinal Farrell has access to information and influence that few others possess. If, as many fear, he has knowledge of McCarrick’s accomplices and enablers, then a dark shadow looms over any role he might play in the conclave – whether through pressure, persuasion, or silence.
In such times, we are not without precedent. In 2013, Cardinal Keith O’Brien of Edinburgh, acknowledging his own unworthiness, voluntarily withdrew from the conclave that elected Pope Francis. He did so not under duress, but in conscience, understanding that the Church’s integrity demanded such a sacrifice.
I therefore call upon Cardinal Kevin Farrell to renounce his role as Camerlengo and to withdraw from participation in the papal conclave, for the sake of the Church’s credibility, for the healing of victims, and for the restoration of trust among the faithful – especially here in the United States.
This is not a call for vengeance, or a judgment of his soul, but a humble appeal for integrity, prudence, and ecclesial charity. Silence in the face of scandal is no longer an option. Let us walk in the light so that the darkness may be overcome.
|
|
|
Beware the “Conservative Savior” |
Posted by: Stone - Yesterday, 10:37 AM - Forum: The Catholic Trumpet
- No Replies
|
 |
I recently read the following comment, which well captures the current situation:
"Whoever follows Francis will almost certainly prove to be yet another calamity – like a serpent shedding its skin, appearing fresh yet unchanged in its intent, still cunning, still venomous. The Catholic Church, betrayed by her own guardians, has been delivered into the hands of her adversaries."
Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us!
Beware the “Conservative Savior”
![[Image: rs=w:1280]](https://img1.wsimg.com/isteam/ip/df55e1a9-c854-4d0b-a2a9-94177954436c/IMG_4488.png/:/cr=t:0%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:100%25/rs=w:1280)
The Catholic Trumpet [slightly adapted and reformatted] | April 29, 2025
The enemy has prepared a new snare.
Not through another radical like Francis, but through the illusion of restoration.
A conservative pope may soon rise—perhaps someone like Cardinal Sarah—who speaks with reverence, offers the Latin Mass, and appears to undo past abuses.
We are praying that God will grant the Church a holy pope.
We pray that He lift the eclipse that now covers the visible Church and bring about a true return to the full Catholic Faith.
But we must also be vigilant.
Because if the next pope reverses certain excesses while leaving the core of Vatican II untouched, this will not be a restoration.
It will be the final deception.
It will be the absorption of Tradition into the structure of apostasy.
As +Archbishop Lefebvre warned, “They are working to lead us, slowly but surely, into their way of thinking, into their apostasy.”
This is not the time for sentiment.
It is the time for clarity.
False Restorations in History
History shows that false restorations often bring deeper ruin.
In 1801, Pope Pius VII signed a Concordat with Napoleon.
It was welcomed as the return of the Church in France.
Seminaries reopened. Churches were restored.
But the Pope formally renounced claims to confiscated Church property and accepted government control over bishops.
Soon after, Napoleon had him imprisoned.
The peace was a trap.
In 1929, Pope Pius XI signed the Lateran Treaty with Mussolini.
This established the Vatican as a sovereign state and resolved the long-standing Roman Question.
But the Church agreed to diplomatic silence regarding certain state policies, giving room for the rise of a secular ideology hostile to the Social Kingship of Christ.
In 1933, another concordat was signed with the German regime.
While it initially protected Church property and rights, it also constrained public Catholic opposition at a time when clarity was most needed.
These examples teach one lesson.
When peace is pursued without doctrinal firmness, it leads not to order, but to capitulation.
Today, the same danger returns.
A pope who appears to restore the old liturgy, but does not renounce the heresies of Vatican II, would be a false peace.
He would offer the form of Catholicism without its substance.
Theological Foundations
Catholics must understand what the Church truly teaches about papal elections.
The Holy Ghost preserves the Church from error in Her official teaching, but He does not guarantee saintly or orthodox popes at every moment in history.
The freedom of men remains.
Popes are not inspired prophets; they are judged by their fidelity to the unchanging Deposit of Faith.
There is also much confusion about the phrase, “the law of prayer is the law of belief”—lex orandi, lex credendi.
Many think that if the traditional Mass returns, the Faith must be returning with it.
But this is backwards.
Pope Pius XII taught in Mediator Dei:
“The Church’s teaching office and law of belief precede and determine the law of prayer.”
He added, “The liturgy does not determine independently and of itself what is of Catholic faith. It must be in entire harmony with the doctrines of the Church.” (Mediator Dei, 1947)
If Vatican II’s false doctrines remain—religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality—then no amount of incense, Latin, or chant will change the reality.
The Faith remains wounded.
+Archbishop Lefebvre said it plainly:
“This conciliar Church is a schismatic Church because it breaks with the Catholic Church that has always been. It has its new priests, its new faith, its new seminaries, its new universities, its new catechisms, its new liturgy.”
The Mass of all time cannot be used to cover the theology of apostasy.
The Modernist Strategy: A “Conservative” Pope
Why would the modernists allow a conservative pope?
Because the crisis has gone too far.
The scandals of Francis have woken up too many Catholics.
The mask is slipping.
The best way to regain control now is to offer back Tradition—but only partially.
To present a pope who wears the cassock, praises the old Mass, and speaks of reverence—yet still upholds the documents of Vatican II.
This would sedate what’s left of the resistance.
It would draw in the neo-SSPX, Trad Inc., and every well-meaning soul longing for peace.
It would bring them under the same errors they once opposed, only now with a Latin Mass in the background.
Pope Saint Pius X warned in Pascendi Dominici Gregis:
“In order not to shock the ears of Catholics, they seek to express their errors in a Catholic way.” (Pascendi, 1907)
Today, the revolution wears a chasuble.
Tradition Inc. and the Neo-SSPX: Preparing for Capitulation
For years now, many traditional groups have been conditioned to see any step toward tradition as a victory, even when the doctrine remains compromised.
They applauded gestures from Rome, even as the Council’s errors remained untouched.
They hoped that good will and respectful tone would save them.
But the trap was being set.
Many of these organizations depend on recognition from Rome, donations from followers, or respectability in conservative media.
A pope who seems friendly to tradition would be the perfect excuse to surrender.
And they will call it “unity.”
Archbishop Lefebvre warned in 1988, “They are working hard to bring us back to the Council by way of tradition. They are hypocrites.”
The goal is not restoration.
It is absorption.
The Final Warning and the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart
In recent months, whispers have circulated among Traditional Catholics about a supposed “conservative Pope” strategy—the idea that the Conciliar Church might present certain sympathetic prelates as a lure to draw the faithful back into the post–Vatican II fold.
We must not underestimate this tactic.
As Pope St. Pius X warned, the modernist error is “the synthesis of all heresies.” (Pascendi, 1907)
In other words, an apparently orthodox veneer can conceal a wholly corrupt system of doctrine.
A halfway return to the post-conciliar hierarchy on the grounds of “unity” only risks swallowing a poison that will undermine true Catholic faith from within.
Pius X warned that such compromise leads “to the destruction not of the Catholic religion alone, but of all religion” — because modernism doesn’t merely corrupt Catholicism; it dissolves the very notion of revealed truth, reducing all religion to subjective feeling and ultimately preparing the world for total unbelief.
Even a single concession paves the way for the enemy’s plan to flourish.
The strategy of promoting a “conservative” figure is applauded by the rationalists of our age, who recognize that their greatest ally is one who appears to be orthodox while secretly advancing novelty.
Every pastoral concession, no matter how small, makes it easier for the Conciliar Church to absorb the faithful into a system ultimately alien to Tradition.
Saint Paul’s warning is particularly apt:
“If the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle?” (1 Corinthians 14:8)
A Church that sends mixed messages—partway restoring traditional forms while retaining conciliar errors—will leave the faithful confused and unable to fight the good fight.
Christ Himself warned, “You shall be hated by all men for My Name’s sake, but he that shall persevere unto the end, he shall be saved.” (Matthew 10:22)
Better to endure exile than accept a false peace.
We cannot judge solely by appearances or personal piety.
We must judge doctrine by doctrine.
As Vatican I declared: “The Roman Pontiff is judged by no one.”
Claims of a “truly conservative” pope must be tested against the unchanging Deposit of Faith.
The solution is not to seek comfort within the Conciliar structure but to persevere in fidelity to the one true Church of Christ.
Yet we are not left without hope.
Our Lady has promised: “In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph.” (Fatima, 1917)
As St. John reveals in the Apocalypse: “They overcame him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony.” (Revelation 12:11)
The darkest plots of our enemies cannot withstand the power of Christ’s Sacrifice and the intercession of the Mother of God.
Let us remain faithful to the traditional Magisterium and the valid sacraments entrusted to us.
Let us trust that Our Lord will use our sufferings to purify His Church.
The Conciliar hierarchy may plot many schemes, but the true Church belongs to Christ and His Vicar.
At this moment of confusion and trial, we pledge ourselves anew to the immutable truth.
The path of compromise leads only to ruin.
The path of fidelity leads to eternal salvation.
We echo the cry of the saints:
All is accomplished for Christ’s Church. The victory is certain through the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Let us hold fast to that sure promise, so that in the end we may share in the glory which Heaven has prepared.
References
Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis, 1907
Pope Pius XII, Mediator Dei, 1947
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, conferences and letters
First Vatican Council, Pastor Aeternus, 1870
1 Corinthians 14:8
Matthew 10:22
Revelation 12:11
Fatima Message, 1917
|
|
|
Mark Carney wins Canadian election as Liberals secure fourth term: reports |
Posted by: Stone - 04-29-2025, 12:01 PM - Forum: Global News
- No Replies
|
 |
Mark Carney wins Canadian election as Liberals secure fourth term: reports
According to CTV News and other outlets, the Liberals are slated to form a minority government with Mark Carney
continuing on in the role as prime minister.
Mark Carney addresses the media after being sworn in as Canada’s 24th Prime Minister at Rideau Hall on March 14, 2025, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Minas Panagiotakis / Getty Images
Apr 28, 2025
(LifeSiteNews [adapted - not all hyperlinks included]) — The Liberal Party of Canada under leader Mark Carney will form a minority government, continuing the Liberals’ nearly decade-long reign, according to CTV News and other outlets.
According to Monday’s ongoing election results, the Liberals are slated to form a minority government with Carney continuing on in the role as prime minister. The victory comes after Carney took over for Justin Trudeau as party leader earlier this year. The Liberals have been in power since 2015, with today’s results securing the party a fourth consecutive term.
Under Carney, the Liberals are expected to continue much of what they did under Trudeau, including the party’s zealous push in favor of abortion, euthanasia, radical gender ideology, internet regulation and so-called “climate change” policies. Indeed, Carney, like Trudeau, seems to have extensive ties to both China and the globalist World Economic Forum, connections which were brought up routinely by conservatives in the lead-up to the election.
Poilievre’s defeat comes as many social conservatives felt betrayed by the leader, who more than once on the campaign trail promised to maintain the status quo on abortion – which is permitted through all nine months of pregnancy – and euthanasia, and who failed to directly address a number of moral issues like the LGBT agenda.
As always, LifeSiteNews encourages all readers to pray for the conversion of their political leaders to the Catholic faith.
This story is developing…
|
|
|
Francis Was a Faithful Son of the Vatican II Revolution |
Posted by: Stone - 04-29-2025, 12:00 PM - Forum: Pope Francis
- No Replies
|
 |
Francis Was a Faithful Son of the Vatican II Revolution
![[Image: 1419fffbc52dfd544b9ffc7c742dddcf_L.jpg]](https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/media/k2/items/cache/1419fffbc52dfd544b9ffc7c742dddcf_L.jpg)
Robert Morrison, Remnant Columnist | April 23, 2025
Francis was a faithful son of the Vatican II revolution. If he managed to save his soul, then surely he will pray for us to learn the most important lesson of his hostile occupation of the papacy: that all the harm he caused was directly related to the changes set in motion at the Council.
Jorge Bergoglio was ordained to the priesthood on December 19, 1969, four years after the close of Vatican II. His immediate predecessors — John Paul II and Benedict XVI — had been influential experts at the Council, but Francis was the first claimant to the papacy to have been formed in the priesthood during the period of revolutionary change propelled by Vatican II. While this does not absolve him of responsibility for his actions, it should help form our assessment of Francis’s role in Church history and learn the lessons that God wants us to learn from the harms he caused.
In his 1968 book about the Council’s aftermath, Is It the Same Church?, Frank Sheed introduced his topic by describing the way in which the Catholic world changed after the Council:
Quote:“My own feeling is that all the changes ushered in by Pope John XXIII were made possible by the forty years which preceded him. But how fast and furiously they have come. Consider how things would strike a Catholic wrecked in 1957 on a desert island and only just now brought home. His Catholic friends have him in their houses. In all of them he finds the conversation beyond him. It circles, sometimes heatedly, around two words which mean nothing to him — Ecumenism and the Pill.” (p. xi)
Sheed was of course referring to debates among Catholics about contraception (which would become the subject of Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae) and the false ecumenism that animated Vatican II. Sheed continued:
Quote:“The weeks that follow are full of shocks. The priest facing the congregation takes some getting used to. And Mass in English even more. He remembers arguments with Protestants in which his trump card had been the use of Latin as proof of the Church’s Catholicity — ‘one language everywhere in the world.’ . . . Whichever way he looks, the Catholic world he knew seems to have turned upside down — and so quickly: after all, he was only away ten years. He hears of priests getting married, with other priests performing the ceremony. He hears of nuns in picket-lines, nuns marching with Negroes and communists in Alabama; of seminarians picketing Cardinals, refusing daily Mass, declaring the Pope unfitted for his primacy.’ (pp. xi-xii)
This is what Jorge Bergoglio would have known during his priestly formation. It was not simply a matter of new beliefs, practices, and disciplines — all around him the Catholic world was unstable, with the only certainty being a radical departure from what had been standard in the eyes of most Catholics prior to the Council.
Elsewhere in Is It the Same Church?, Sheed listed ten matters he would consider changing if he was Pope:
Quote:“(1) The election of the Pope by the Cardinals; . . .
(2) The appointment of all Bishops by Rome;
(3) Clerical celibacy;
(4) The obligation of Sunday Mass;
(5) Diocesan seminaries;
(6) Communion in one kind only;
(7) Reservation of the Blessed Sacrament;
(8) Marriage in the presence of the priest;
(9) Vestments, special clerical dress, various titles and insignia;
(10) Censorship, the Index, Imprimaturs, etc.” (p. 9)
Sheed is still well-respected in Traditional Catholic circles today, with his books remaining in Traditional Catholic bookstores and online catalogs. As we can see, though, the list he compiled while Bergoglio was still a seminarian includes a few items most Traditional Catholics would consider to be impermissible changes. It should thus come as no surprise that a priest formed during this time would wholeheartedly embrace the revolutionary spirit that Sheed clearly adopted after the Council.
As another frame of reference, we can consider Yves Congar, one of the most important experts at Vatican II. In his farewell address to the clergy of Rome, Benedict XVI listed Congar among the “great figures” from Vatican II:
Quote:“And this continued throughout the Council: small-scale meetings with peers from other countries. Thus I came to know great figures like Father de Lubac, Daniélou, Congar, and so on.”
So Benedict XVI spoke well of Congar, who had been made a Cardinal by John Paul II. But Congar understood the revolutionary spirit of Vatican II quite well because he had helped kindle it:
Quote:“By the frankness and openness of its debates, the Council has put an end to what may be described as the inflexibility of the system. We take ‘system’ to mean a coherent set of codified teachings, casuistically-specified rules of procedure, a detailed and very hierarchic organization, means of control and surveillance, rubrics regulating worship — all this is the legacy of scholasticism, the Counter-reformation and the Catholic Restoration of the nineteenth century, subjected to an effective Roman discipline. It will be recalled that Pius XII is supposed to have said: ‘I will be the last Pope to keep all this going.’” (Congar, Challenge to the Church: The Case of Archbishop Lefebvre, pp. 51-52)
In other words, Vatican II not only yielded certain identifiable changes in belief and practice but also fostered an environment in which almost everything else was subject to change. It should come as no surprise, then, that Francis cited Congar as an inspiration for the most revolutionary project of his occupation of the papacy, the Synod on Synodality:
Quote:The Holy Spirit guides us where God wants us to be, not to where our own ideas and personal tastes would lead us. Father Congar, of blessed memory, once said: ‘There is no need to create another Church, but to create a different Church’ (True and False Reform in the Church). That is the challenge. For a ‘different Church,’ a Church open to the newness that God wants to suggest, let us with greater fervour and frequency invoke the Holy Spirit and humbly listen to him, journeying together as he, the source of communion and mission, desires: with docility and courage.”
Congar had been suspected of heresy during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII and should never have been allowed to play a pivotal role at Vatican II. It was an insult to the Holy Ghost for John XXIII to appoint Congar (like Rahner, Kung, etc.) as an expert at the Council. Ideas have consequences: once you break with Tradition and endorse radical change in the Church, there are few boundaries to the amount of destruction that can occur.
Who was supposed to convince Francis that Congar and the other Vatican II revolutionaries were wrong? The primary opponent of the Vatican II revolution, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, had been censured by Paul VI and excommunicated by John Paul II, two men canonized by Francis. And the conservative Catholics who ought to have opposed the Vatican II revolution have instead directed their energy toward supporting the Council’s innovations against anyone who has sided with Archbishop Lefebvre.
Francis was a faithful son of the Vatican II revolution. If he managed to save his soul, then surely he will pray for us to learn the most important lesson of his hostile occupation of the papacy: that all the harm he caused was directly related to the changes set in motion at the Council. Regardless of whether Francis saved his soul, though, it seems evident that God wants us to abandon the anti-Catholic ideas that have plagued the Church since the Council. If we refuse to do this, then we deserve for the next claimant to the papacy to be even more anti-Catholic than Francis. May God have mercy on him and us.
Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us.
|
|
|
Conclave to elect new pope will start on May 7 |
Posted by: Stone - 04-28-2025, 07:35 AM - Forum: General Commentary
- No Replies
|
 |
Conclave to elect new pope will start on May 7
The conclave will see cardinals gather in the Sistine Chapel to elect a new pope as the 267th Roman Pontiff.
![[Image: 0DBB187C-3686-405B-851B-8161270D060B_1_1...0x500.jpeg]](https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/0DBB187C-3686-405B-851B-8161270D060B_1_105_c-e1741541127712-810x500.jpeg)
Apr 28, 2025
VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican has confirmed that the new conclave will start on May 7, as cardinals look to elect the new pope following Francis’ death.
After the close of the General Congregation this morning, the Holy See Press Office confirmed to journalists that the conclave will commence on May 7, next Wednesday. This falls in the time scale set by the Church’s law, which mandates the conclave start between 15 and 20 days following the death of a pope.
Pope Francis died on April 21, a week ago today.
His funeral was held on Saturday, as cardinals have continued to grow in number at the Vatican as they return to the City State from across the world.
May 7 will see the cardinals gather for a Mass in the morning, as they pray for guidance for the forthcoming conclave. They will then process into the Sistine Chapel for the first round of voting to be held in the afternoon.
This story is developing…
|
|
|
Disgraced former LA Cardinal Roger Mahony chosen to help seal Francis’ casket |
Posted by: Stone - 04-26-2025, 05:42 AM - Forum: Pope Francis
- No Replies
|
 |
Disgraced former LA Cardinal Roger Mahony chosen to help seal Francis’ casket
Mahony, 89, is widely considered to be one of the worst clerics of the past forty years,
having been implicated in a massive sex abuse cover-up in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.
LOS ANGELES, CA - DECEMBER 25: Cardinal Roger Mahony leads Christmas mass at The Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels December 25, 2010 in Los Angeles, California.
Eric Thayer / Getty Images
Apr 25, 2025
(LifeSiteNews) — Disgraced U.S. Cardinal Roger Mahony has been chosen to help seal Pope Francis’ casket for his funeral this weekend.
Mahony, 89, is widely considered to be one of the worst clerics in the U.S. over the past forty years. He served as the Archbishop of Los Angeles from 1985 until 2011. As a result of his covering up of abuse, the archdiocese paid out more than $660 million to more than 500 victims over the course of his tenure.
Following his retirement, Mahony was scandalously allowed by Los Angeles Archbishop Jose Gomez to participate in the archdiocese’s religious education conference in 2019.
Mahony took part in the 2019 installation Mass of former archbishop of Washington, D.C. Cardinal Wilton Gregory, who was an acolyte of Theodore McCarrick, the former, now deceased, archbishop of Washington D.C. He also participated in the installation Mass of Archbishop Joe Vásquez in the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston this March.
News of Mahony’s involvement in the ceremony was not well received by Catholics.
“Shame on him for participating in the public rite for Pope Francis, and shame on the College of Cardinals for allowing him to do so,” Anne Barrett Doyle, co-director of Bishop Accountability.org, told the New York Post.
Author Peachy Keenan echoed those sentiments on X. “I will be boycotting the Pope’s funeral because the Vatican has chosen to include Cardinal Roger Mahony closely in the funeral ceremony. He is personally responsible for the mass rape of dozens, perhaps hundreds, of small boys in California and should be doing hard time in San Quentin, not frolicking in Rome. Shame on everyone involved in this travesty,” she remarked.
In 2013 a court demanded that some 12,000 pages related to Mahony’s time in office be released. The documents showed Mahony purposely concealed from the public knowledge of priests who had committed sex crimes with minors, and that he transferred the perpetrators after they received counseling only to have them sexually abuse again and again. The abuses were so severe that Gomez commented at the time, “the behavior described in these files is terribly sad and evil.”
Vatican spokesperson Matteo Bruni said that Mahony was chosen based on his seniority as a cardinal. But Mahony told ABC 7 News that he and Francis often communicated.
“He encouraged us to write to him,” Mahony said. “I don’t know if anybody else did, but I started writing to him, and he answers the letters. I have, I don’t know the final number, over 30 letters back from the pope, Pope Francis. He responds to them.”
Francis’ funeral will take place Saturday at 10 a.m. in St. Peter’s Square. LifeSite’s Michael Haynes reports that a “small group of transsexuals” will attend. The coffin ceremony will take place Friday at 8pm in St. Peter’s as well. It will be overseen by Cardinal Kevin Farrell, Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church, and will include Cardinals Pietro Parolin and Giovanni Battista Re, as well Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra, among others.
|
|
|
‘Transgender’ individuals to welcome Pope Francis’ coffin at burial site |
Posted by: Stone - 04-26-2025, 05:38 AM - Forum: Pope Francis
- No Replies
|
 |
‘Transgender’ individuals to welcome Pope Francis’ coffin at burial site
As announced by Vatican News, some self-described transgender individuals be included in a welcoming party for Pope Francis’ remains at the Basilica of St. Mary Major.
Pope Francis meets with transgender activist group at weekly audience
LifeSiteNews
Apr 25, 2025
VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews [adapted - not all hyperlinks included from original]) — A party of self-described transgender individuals will form part of a small group welcoming Pope Francis’ body to the Roman basilica where he will be buried on Saturday.
As announced by Vatican News – the in-house news outlet for the Vatican – some gender-confused individuals will be included in a welcoming party for Pope Francis’ remains at the Basilica of St. Mary Major.
A group of of some 40 people were already due to be present outside the basilica on Saturday afternoon in order to form an official welcoming party to the mortal remains of the late pope. This was explained by the Holy See Press Office as being reflective of the pope’s attention to the poor during his life.
But a little later, Vatican News quoted the words of one of Rome’s auxiliary bishop – Bishop Benoni Ambarus – who gave further details about who would constitute the party.
Ambarus said there will be “a small representation of transsexuals whom I know, whom we follow through a small community of nuns.”
Also present will be some of Rome’s poor, homeless, prisoners, and migrants.
Explaining this, Ambarus said, “There will also be prisoners met at the opening of the Holy Door in Rebibbia [prison]. It is a moving choice, because the Holy Father will be welcomed by the Mother he loved so much and by his beloved children who will surround him.”
“Ideally, it is as if all his beloved people were accompanying him on his last steps,” he added.
The precise details of who will be in the party are not yet public.
Francis is well known for his frequent hosting of transgender groups at the Vatican, along with key transgender activists such as Sister Jeannine Gramick.
Asked about this during a television interview earlier this year, Francis said “Proximity! That’s the word. Proximity to everybody. Everyone.”
Francis’ practicing of “proximity” has included a number of audiences and meetings with individuals actively living as though a member of the opposite sex, or key LGBT activists. He has also welcomed a group of purportedly transgender individuals as VIP guests at his weekly audiences, after Sister Genevieve Jeanningros facilitated the encounter between them and the pontiff.
Participants of these encounters have also recounted how meeting the Pope re-enforced them, rather than awakening them to their biological reality.
One woman, who lives as a man, commented that her meeting confirmed her in her “transgender identity.”
The Catholic Church calls all souls to the practice of chastity, but particular care is given to those suffering with same-sex attraction to offer the assistance needed but also to ensure that the fullness of Catholic morality is not compromised in this endeavor.
Teaching found re-iterated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church notes that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered” and “contrary to the natural law.” The catechism is very clear that homosexual activity can never be approved, and repeats that “[h]omosexual persons are called to chastity.”
The late pope’s LGBT record infamously began with his 2013 in-flight comments, “Who am I to judge?” when asked about the existence of a gay lobby within the Vatican and the practice of homosexuality. Such support took a marked increase in the wake of the Vatican’s March 2021 responsum condemning same-sex “blessings,” as Francis made numerous public statements praising and supporting advocates of LGBT ideology and same-sex civil unions.
Then in December 2023, he authorized the Declaration Fiducia Supplicans, which contained approval for “blessings for couples in irregular situations and for couples of the same sex.” Written by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández – prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith – and approved by Francis, the document caused instant and widespread consternation throughout the global Church.
Fiducia Supplicans was swiftly welcomed by LGBT advocates and heterodox clerics, while vocal opposition was found predominantly in Africa along with a steadily growing number of dioceses in the U.S., Europe, the U.K., and among religious orders.
Notable prelates – Cardinals Gerhard Müller and Joseph Zen and Robert Sarah, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, Bishop Athanasius Schneider – all penned their rejection of the document’s proposal for same-sex blessings, many doing so repeatedly. Sarah went as far as to state that Fiducia Supplicans proposes a “heresy that gravely undermines the Church, the Body of Christ, because it is contrary to the Catholic faith and tradition.”
Fiducia Supplicans’ publication arguably caused one of the greatest tumults in the Francis pontificate up until that time, with the global backlash against the text on a scale previously unseen in the prior 11 years of Francis’ reign.
LifeSiteNews readers are invited to continue praying for the repose of the soul of Pope Francis.
|
|
|
UK To Greenlight Experiments To "Dim The Sun" In Bid To Stop Global Warming |
Posted by: Stone - 04-26-2025, 05:32 AM - Forum: Global News
- No Replies
|
 |
UK To Greenlight Experiments To "Dim The Sun" In Bid To Stop Global Warming
ZH [adapted and reformatted] | Apr 24, 2025
It's a project reminiscent of the movie Snowpiercer, in which governments institute a global experiment to spray chemicals into the atmosphere to stop global warming and end up creating a new ice age instead. Once again reality is downstream from fiction as the UK is set to bankroll an experiment to "dim the sun". This goal will be pursued in field trials which could include injecting aerosols into the atmosphere, or brightening clouds to reflect sunshine.
The project is being considered by scientists as a way to prevent "runaway climate change", despite the fact that there is zero evidence to support the claim of runaway climate change.
Aria, the Government’s advanced research and invention funding agency, has set aside £50 million for projects, which will be announced in the coming weeks.
Prof Mark Symes, the program director for Aria (Advanced Research and Invention Agency), said there would be “small controlled outdoor experiments on particular approaches”.
“We will be announcing who we have given funding to in a few weeks and when we do so we will be making clear when any outdoor experiments might be taking place,” he said.
“One of the missing pieces in this debate was physical data from the real world. Models can only tell us so much. Everything we do is going to be safe by design. We’re absolutely committed to responsible research, including responsible outdoor research. We have strong requirements around the length of time experiments can run for and their reversibility and we won’t be funding the release of any toxic substances to the environment.”
One major area of research is Sunlight Reflection Methods (SRM), which includes Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) whereby tiny particles are released into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight. Another potential project is Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB) in which ships would spray sea-salt particles into the sky to enhance the reflectivity of low-lying clouds.
Climate scientists say efforts to reduce carbon emissions are not working fast enough and that levels are "too high", leading to irregular weather patterns and eventually the temperature "tipping point" in which an exponential crisis is created by heat creating carbon and then carbon creating more heat.
The problem is that nothing in this theory is backed by causational evidence or the climate history of the Earth. In other words, climate scientists are siphoning up government grant money to create solutions to a problem that doesn't exist. The vast majority of climate change theories are based on data collected since the 1880s - 140 years of data is a insignificant window of time in the long lifespan of the Earth's climate.
When we look at the temperature data over millions of years, we find that today's temps are near the lowest in our planet's history (we just exited an Ice Age not long ago and climate scientists want us to believe it's too hot)
When comparing millions of years of carbon data to parallel temperature data, it becomes clear that there is no correlation between carbon levels and global warming. This graph also proves that carbon and temperature levels can rise and fall independently of human industry and human industry's effects on these patterns is negligible or non-existent.
There is also no data to prove correlation or causation between carbon emissions and extreme weather patterns. The entirety of the climate change theory is based on lab models with no corresponding examples in nature. It is pure hysteria.
This makes the use of atmospheric manipulation by governments all the more disturbing. If they truly are trying to "dim the sun" for the sake of preventing global warming, then they are doing so based on a delusion. There is also the possibility that they know man-made climate change is nonsense and these experiments serve another purpose. In either case, they should be stopped. No one voted for politicians to blot out the sun (or to find a way to blot out the sun). No one gave them permission to pump particulates or chemicals into the sky. Their actions constitute a radical violation of the public trust.
|
|
|
|