Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 296
» Latest member: m@c
» Forum threads: 6,906
» Forum posts: 12,862
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 340 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 337 Guest(s) Applebot, Bing, Google
|
|
|
The Holocaust, Vatican II, and the Crisis in the Catholic Church |
Posted by: Stone - 04-15-2025, 07:21 AM - Forum: Articles by Catholic authors
- No Replies
|
 |
The Holocaust, Vatican II, and the Crisis in the Catholic Church
Rabbi Heschel and Cardinal Bea look at a Yiddish newspaper in the offices of the American Jewish Committee in 1963.
Robert Morrison, Remnant Columnist | April 15, 2025
Appallingly, there are some who still think that the best cure for anti-Semitism is anti-Catholicism. We see this especially from those who insist that we cannot proclaim the Kingship of Christ.
In his Augustin Bea: The Cardinal of Unity, Bea’s longtime secretary, Fr. Stjepan Schmidt, quoted a letter to Bea from Nahum Goldmann in the name of the World Conference of Jewish Organizations:
Quote:“Now that the Ecumenical Council is coming to an end and the declaration on relations with the Jewish people has been approved with such a resounding majority, I feel the need to express to you both personally and in the name of the organizations I represent our gratitude for the wise yet also courageous manner in which you and your secretariat have brought this far-from-easy declaration to success. I am sure that Your Eminence knows that we are not happy about several changes in respect to the previous draft, but in this sinful world nobody ever gets everything he wants . . .” (p. 524)
Why did Mr. Goldmann, a prominent Zionist, express his displeasure with the final draft of Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate? His Jewish organizations had not made any concessions in exchange for the Council’s pro-Jewish document, and we do not have any substantiated evidence that those organizations paid Bea to modify Catholic teaching. So what was it that Goldman thought gave the Jewish organizations a right to demand changes from the Catholic Church?
To begin to understand the intriguing dynamic that prompted Mr. Goldmann to scold Cardinal Bea in his letter of appreciation, we can begin with Jules Isaac. Norman Tobias’s 2008 Master’s Thesis helps us appreciate Isaac’s role at Vatican II:
Quote:“How ironic that the primary catalyst in connection with the reorientation of the Catholic Church's attitudes toward Jews and Judaism should have been a Jew. Having lost his wife, daughter and son-in-law in Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen, septuagenarian French Jewish historian Jules Isaac emerged from the Second World War to wage a single-handed campaign, in words and in deeds, for the rectification of Roman Catholic teachings about Jews and Judaism, contemptuous teachings, argued Isaac, that over-reached the bounds of scriptural and historical accuracy, contemptuous teachings, contended Isaac, that had sustained and nourished other varieties of anti-semitism for nearly two millennia. We now know that it did not occur to John XXIII to add to the agenda of Vatican II the relationship between the Church and the Jews until one week after the close of the pre-preparatory phase of Vatican II when John XXIII met one-on-one with Jules Isaac.”
Mr. Tobias subsequently wrote a valuable book on Isaac, Jewish Conscience of the Church, but this brief abstract gets to the heart of the matter: Isaac believed that the Catholic Church had promoted anti-Semitism, which had contributed to the horrors of the Holocaust.
In his Jewish Conscience of the Church, Tobias provided Isaac’s recollections from his June 13, 1960 meeting with John XXIII:
Quote:“I then explained my request regarding [Christian] teaching and its historical grounding. But how, in a few minutes, could I explain this spiritual ghetto in which the Church had ultimately confined old Israel — along with the physical ghetto? I described the bookends which sandwiched the Christian epoch, at one end a pagan antisemitism, incoherent and preposterous in its accusations and at the other end, racial antisemitism, Hitlerian, the most virulent of our day, though no less incoherent and preposterous. But between the two, the only variety [of antisemitism] that was coherent and by which one could be taken in, is that which has engendered a certain Christian theology, by force of circumstances, since the Jewish negation constituted the primary impediment to Christian proselytizing in the gentile world.” (p. 187)
There are several important points in this excerpt from Isaac’s description of his discussion with John XXIII: anti-Semitism predated Christianity; Hitler’s anti-Semitism was not Christian in nature; and, according to Isaac, Christian anti-Semitism was in response to the way in which the “Jewish negation” hindered Christian proselytism. By “Jewish negation” Isaac meant the Jewish assertion that Jesus is not the Messiah, God, and King.
In hindsight, John XXIII might have done well to inform Mr. Isaac of an important consideration, which Dr. Joseph Shaw noted in a recent article — that “the sin of antisemetism was defined and condemned by the Holy Office more than a generation before Vatican II, in 1928”:
“Moved by this charity, the Apostlic See has protected the same people [the Jews] against unjust vexations, and just as it reproves all ill-will and animosity among peoples, so also does it condemn, in the strongest possible terms, hatred against the people that was once chosen by God, namely that hatred that is now usually termed ‘Antisemitism’.” (Sacra Congregatio Sancti Officii, Decretum de consociatione vulgo ‘Amici Israël’ abolenda, March 25, 1928, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 20 (1928): 104.)
Several prominent Jewish leaders worked with Cardinal Bea to promote two primary Jewish aims at the Council: the exoneration of the Jewish people from any enduring guilt in connection with the Crucifixion of Jesus, and disavowal of Catholic teaching that the Jewish people should (like all people) be converted to the true Christian Faith.
As it turned out, though, several prominent Jewish leaders worked with Cardinal Bea to promote two primary Jewish aims at the Council: the exoneration of the Jewish people from any enduring guilt in connection with the Crucifixion of Jesus, and disavowal of Catholic teaching that the Jewish people should (like all people) be converted to the true Christian Faith. Because this latter point has received so little attention since Vatican II, it is worth examining it in detail.
The Jewish Interest in Religious Liberty at Vatican II
In his They Have Uncrowned Him, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre asserted that the B’nai B’rith had asked Cardinal Bea to promote religious liberty at Vatican II:
Quote:“‘Freemasons, what do you want? What do you ask of us?’ Such is the question that Cardinal Bea went to ask the B’nai B’rith before the beginning of the Council. The interview was announced by all the papers of New York, where it took place. And the Freemasons answered that what they wanted was ‘religious liberty!’ — that is to say, all the religions put on the same footing. The Church must no longer be called the only true religion, the sole path of salvation, the only one accepted by the State. Let us finish with these inadmissible privileges. And so, declare religious liberty. Well, they got it: it was Dignitatis humanae.” (p. 214)
Although the Jewish B’nai B’rith had been founded by Freemasons, there does not appear to be a current connection between B’nai B’rith and Freemasonry. Other than that, though, the substance of Archbishop Lefebvre’s claim appears entirely consistent with the statements below from Cardinal Bea and Jewish sources.
In her study on The Church and the Jews: The Struggle at Vatican Council II, Judith Hershcopf affirmed that the B’nai B’rith lobbied the Vatican on the question of the Council’s Declaration on Religious Freedom, Dignitatis Humanae:
Quote:“In March 1964 a B'nai B'rith delegation of three met with Pope Paul VI and communicated the ‘profound interest’ of the Jewish community in the proposed declaration on religious freedom and Catholic-Jewish relations.”
As Archbishop Lefebvre observed above, this document (along with others promulgated at the Council) ultimately opposed what the pre-Vatican II popes had taught. Hershcopf noted that conservative Council Fathers (such as Archbishop Lefebvre) opposed Dignitatis Humanae because it undermined the authority of the Church and promoted indifferentism:
Quote:“There were prelates indifferent to the Jewish question, but strongly opposed to the statement on religious liberty for fear it would be used to undermine the authority of the church and encourage indifferentism or Communism. The ultra-conservatives were opposed to both.”
This observation is critical because Archbishop Lefebvre and other opponents of Dignitatis Humanae knew during the Council that it would promote precisely the evils that have plagued the Church for the past sixty years: the undermining of the Church’s authority, and encouragement for the religious indifferentism that is so evident both in the widespread apostasy from the Faith as well as the rampant cafeteria Catholicism that dominates everywhere, from diocesan catechism classes to the Vatican. As Archbishop Lefebvre knew, only those who opposed the Catholic Church would benefit from this.
Aside from Jules Isaac, one of the most important Jewish influences at the Council was Professor Abraham Joshua Heschel, a rabbi at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. Heschel’s May 22, 1962 memorandum to Bea, On Improving Catholic-Jewish Relations, requested that the Council would respect Jews as Jews rather than try to convert them:
Quote:“Thus, it is our sincere hope that the Ecumenical Council would acknowledge the integrity and permanent preciousness of Jews and Judaism.”
How, though, could the Council do this without completely repudiating the Great Commission? In his The Church and the Jewish People, Cardinal Bea explained how the Council attempted to thread the needle in Nostra Aetate:
Quote:“Another difficulty I have often encountered in contacts with Jews is the fear that our only desire is to ‘convert’ them — a word which all too often brings back very painful memories, and that whatever the Church does is ultimately directed to this hidden purpose. And by ‘convert’ is understood, if not use of actual force and pressure, at least the intention of seducing men by subtle argument and astute manipulation to betray their own conscience. However, on this count also the Church has nothing to hide. In the conciliar document she explicitly and openly declares that it is both her duty and her desire to preach Christ who is ‘the way, the truth and the life,’ in whom God has reconciled all things to himself. From the beginning it is pointed out that the aim of the document is to investigate all that men have in common and which encourages them to live together and fulfill their common destiny; not, therefore, to dwell upon what divides and differentiates them.” (pp. 19-20)
Thus, according to Bea, the Church must continue to “preach Christ,” but without any real effort to “convert” non-Catholics (including Jews). Bea continued by describing the role of Dignitatis Humanae in further distancing the Church from its Great Commission:
Quote:“In addition, in the conciliar document on religious liberty, the Church solemnly declares as her own teaching the duty and the right of every man to pursue truth and justice according to the dictates of his own conscience, unimpeded and untrammeled. In the Declaration with which this commentary deals, she exhorts her own members to recognize, preserve and promote whatever is spiritually, morally, socially or culturally valuable in different religions from their own.” (p. 20)
With these and many other words along the same lines, Bea essentially confirmed Archbishop Lefebvre’s description of Dignitatis Humanae from above: “The Church must no longer be called the only true religion, the sole path of salvation, the only one accepted by the State.”
Although we could add other similar statements to further demonstrate the reality that Jewish leaders and organizations played a significant role in shaping Vatican II’s statements on religious liberty, the last to consider here is from Mr. Tobias, in his prologue to Jewish Conscience of the Church, in which he quotes Gregory Baum at length:
Quote:“‘Passages in the New Testament say that those who believe and are baptized will be saved, and those who refuse to believe will be damned. Some passages also say that the hard-heartedness of the Jews leaves them in darkness, deserted by God,’ according to Catholic theologian Gregory Baum, another of those who drafted Nostra aetate (No. 4). ‘They say that salvation is in Jesus and in no other name, and that the Gospel is the single offer of redemption for the sinful world. (Of course, there are also passages with a different message.) On the basis of the exclusivist biblical texts, the Church began to teach extra ecclesiam nulla salus,’ (outside the Church there is no salvation.) After the Holocaust, the Church, recognizing, not without shame, the cultural impact of its anti-Jewish discourse and the implications this discourse had in legitimizing antisemitism, was to read Paul’s letter to the Romans in a new way.” (p. xviii)
Thus, according to Tobias and Baum, the Holocaust nudged the Church at Vatican II to abandon its teaching that there is no salvation outside the Church.
For those who might not know Fr. Gregory Baum’s credentials beyond having helped draft Nostra Aetate, it is worth noting that he was a Jewish convert to Catholicism who had been criticized at the Council as not having sincerely converted. We can perhaps gauge the depth of his conversion from his 2017 obituary:
Quote:“He wrote that he considered resigning from the priesthood but did not go through with the formality. He later married a divorced ex-nun who he says ‘did not mind that, when we moved to Montreal in 1986, I met Normand, a former priest, with whom I fell in love.’”
Thus we have a striking emblem of the cause and effect of the crisis in the Church.
There may seem to be little value in dredging up the history of Vatican II at this point but, appallingly, there are some who still think that the best cure for anti-Semitism is anti-Catholicism. We see this especially from those who insist that we cannot proclaim the Kingship of Christ. They seem oblivious to the irrefutable reality that this is precisely the type of anti-Catholic bigotry that has caused hundreds of millions of souls to abandon the religion that they once considered to be the path to salvation. As our Lord told us, we should be willing to suffer anything rather than that catastrophe:
Quote:“For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul? For the Son of man shall come in the glory of His Father with His angels: and then will He render to every man according to his works.” (Matthew 16: 26-27)
[...]
Our Lady of Sorrows, pray for us!
|
|
|
The Last Letter of Garcia Moreno |
Posted by: Stone - 04-15-2025, 06:51 AM - Forum: Articles by Catholic authors
- No Replies
|
 |
The Last Letter of Garcia Moreno
Gabriel Garcia Moreno 1821-1875
Margaret Galitzin, TIA [slightly reformatted and adapted] | April 14, 2025
Gabriel Garcia Moreno (1821-1875) had ruled over the Republic of Ecuador for nearly 15 years and was in the act of entering on his third presidency, to which he had been re-elected by the a great majority of the people, when he was assassinated by an order of the German Freemasonry on August 9, 1875. The atrocious crime took place in the square of the Presidential Palace in Quito.
On commencing his government this illustrious man found the State in great disorder, ruled by a Masonic and Liberal anti-clerical government. By means of his profound genius, his skill in action, his firmness in carrying out his plans, and above all by his piety and confidence in God, he not only reformed the customs, but also put order in every department of political administration, and made the country a paragon of a truly Catholic commonwealth at a time when this seemed impossible.
Garcia Moreno was remarkable for his piety. Though pressed by the incessant and weighty cares of office, he always found time to hear Mass every morning and to say his Rosary every evening. Before undertaking any important action, he would go before the Blessed Sacrament to draw light from the Fountain of Wisdom. In fact it was just after leaving the church that be received the fatal thrust of the assassin’s dagger.
This religious fervor gave birth in him to a great zeal for God’s glory and a strong devotion to Christ’s Vicar. Suffice it to say that when there was question of concluding a Concordat with the Holy See, he sent his ambassador to Rome with a document that had nothing written on it but his signature. As an act of trust in the Pontiff Pius IX, he desired that the Holy Father should fill out the blank sheet with whatever seemed to him just and conducive to the good of the Church and the true well-being of the people.
Garcia Moreno signs the Concordat between Pope Pius IX & the Republic of Ecuador, 1862
When the revolution entered Rome triumphant through the breach of Porta Pia in 1870, bringing an end to the Papal States, Garcia Moreno alone stepped forward among rulers to protest solemnly against the sacrilegious usurpation. And to relieve the sufferings of the plundered Pontiff, who had become a veritable "prisoner in the Vatican," he petitioned the Congress to vote a considerable sum of money to be sent to the Pope monthly as the country’s tribute of fidelity.
His piety and filial devotion to the Church is perhaps best expressed in the message he composed to the Congress, which he finished writing a few hours before his death. That bloodstained letter was found in his bosom after the assassination.
It ran thus:
Quote:“Senators and Representatives. Of all the great gifts which God has vouchsafed our Republic from the inexhaustible treasure of His mercy, I consider that the greatest is to see you reunited, through His protecting support, beneath the shadow of the peace that He grants to us and preserves in us, although we are nothing, capable of nothing, and know not how to reply to His paternal goodness except by an inexcusable and shameful ingratitude.
Carrying a large cross down the streets of Quito during Holy Week
“But a few years ago, Ecuador was daily experiencing those sad words, first uttered by the ‘liberator’ Bolivar in his last message to the Congress of 1830: 'I blush to confess it, independence is the only good we have acquired, and that at the cost of every other.'
“Since that time, however, placing all our hope in God, we have distanced ourselves from the torrent of impiety and apostasy that storms the world in this age of errors, and today have reorganized into a truly Catholic nation. And we see that everything has turned out to the good and prosperity of our dear country.
“Ecuador was a corpse, from which life had fled; like a carcass it laid, preyed upon by the multitude of horrible insects that liberty or putrefaction was continually breeding in the darkness of the sepulchre. But today, at the command of that supreme Voice which bade Lazarus rise from his fetid tomb, our country also has returned to life, though it still retains the bands and winding-sheet of death, that is, the remains or the wretchedness and corruption in which we were buried.
“To prove the truth of my words, I need but give a brief account or the advances made by us in the two last years, just as I find them recorded in greater detail in the documents and particular reports of each minister. And in order to ascertain more exactly how far we have proceeded during this period of regeneration, I shall compare the present state of affairs with the one from which we took our start; not, indeed, with a view to our own praise, but in order to glorify Him to whom we owe all, and whom we adore as our Redeemer and Father, as our Protector and God.” (Here follows an enumeration or all the advantages obtained, which he summarizes).
Garcia Moreno with Jesuits, whom he returned to the country after they were expelled by a previous Masonic government
“To the full liberty which the Church possesses among us and to the apostolic zeal of our virtuous pastors are due the reform of the clergy, the improvement in morals and the diminution of crime, which is so striking that in a population of more than one million, there is not to be found a sufficient number of criminals to people our penitentiary.
“To the Church again are we obliged for those religious congregations that produce such an abundance of good fruits by the instruction they give to children and youth, and the help they extend towards the sick and abandoned. We are their debtors for the renewal of the religious spirit in this year of jubilee and sanctification, and for the conversion of 9,000 savages on our eastern province to a Christian and civilized life.
“On account of the vast tract of country there is urgent need in this province of a second Vicariate. If you authorize me to treat this matter with the Holy See, I will see to its establishment. I intend, moreover, to further its commerce by rooting out the speculations and violent exactions to which the poor inhabitants have long been subject on the part of inhuman traders. Yet laborers are wanting; and, to form these, we must yearly come to the aid of our venerable and most zealous Archbishop in the building of a large seminary, which he has not hesitated to commence, relying on the protection of Heaven and our own efficacious cooperation.
“Do not lose sight of the fact that our small successes would be short-lived and useless had we not founded the social order of our Republic on the ever-assailed and ever-victorious rock of the Catholic Church. Her divine teaching, which neither individuals nor nations can reject without losing themselves, is the rule of our institutions and the law of our legislation.
“As faithful and docile children of that venerable, august and infallible Pontiff, whom all the powers of earth have abandoned as a vile and cowardly impiety besets him, we have continued to send him every month our small pecuniary succor, set aside by you for him in 1863. Since our want of strength obliges us to remain passive spectators of his slow martyrdom, may this poor gift be at least a proof of our good will and affection, and a pledge to him of our obedience and fidelity.
“In a few days my present term of office will expire. The Republic has enjoyed six years of peace, interrupted only by a momentary rising in 1879 of the natives of Riobamba against the white population. During these six years we have marched forward with rapid strides on the way to true progress under the visible protection of Providence. The results would certainly have been far more magnificent had I possessed the qualities for governing, which unfortunately I lack, or endeavored to be more fervent about the accomplishment of good.
“If I have committed defects, I ask your pardon a thousand times, and with sincere sorrow do I implore forgiveness of all my fellow-citizens, being persuaded that my will had no part in them. If, however, you think that I have succeeded in anything, attribute it to God first and to the Immaculate Dispensatrix of the inexhaustible treasures of His mercy, and next to yourselves, the people, the army, and to all who have assisted me with their advice and fidelity in the fulfillment of my arduous duties.
Signed, Gabriel Garcia Moreno
Quito, August 1865
This is how a Catholic ruler speaks. This testimony was sealed indeed with his very blood, for he wrote it just a short time before he was surprised by his assassins. It is a testimony all the more poignant as it seems that he foresaw that tragic moment when, as that blameless father, he asked the pardon of his subordinates, as if he had done anything else but selflessly bestow on them so many benefits.
Garcia Moreno confronts Liberalism
It seems fitting to close with a brief resume of how this valiant leader confronted and conquered – with God’s help – the liberal spirit of his times:
• Garcia Moreno began with God, and placed God at the head of the government of his people. Liberalism wants an atheistic State and deems it a disgrace even to mention the name of God in public acts.
• Garcia Moreno desired an intimate union with the Catholic Church, declaring that she must be the foundation of the social order, and that her teaching must be the guide for all human laws and institutions. Liberalism not only separates the Church from the State, but raises also the State above the Church, making civil laws the standard to which all ecclesiastical enactments most be referred
• Garcia Moreno wanted the pastors of the Church to have full freedom, and obtained from them in return the reform of the clergy and the morality of the people. Liberalism clogs the action of bishops, urges the low clergy to rebel against their superiors, and tries to remove the people from the influence of both bishops and priest.
• Garcia Moreno supported the already existing religious establishments and added others to their number. Liberalism abolishes them.
• Moreno respected ecclesiastical property and helped to fund new seminaries. Liberalism confiscates the goods of the Church and closes the seminaries.
• Moreno entrusted the education and instruction of youth to the clergy and to religious orders. Liberalism enforces secular education, excluding every religious element as much as possible.
• Moreno removed from his Catholic people every scandal of a false worship. Liberalism publishes liberty of worship, and opens the door to every heresy and corrupting influence in public morals.
• Moreno saw in himself that weakness which is proper to man, and refered to God all the good which he accomplished. Liberalism, puffs up with satanic pride, thinks itself capable of everything, and ascribes all to the powers of man.
Thus Garcia Moreno put the true theory of Christian government into practice when, in perfect opposition to the principles and wishes of the Liberalism that prevailed in his days, he wisely applied it to the Republic of Ecuador.
Adapted from the article “Friend of the Sacred Heart & a Martyr to Justice, N.A., in The Messenger of the Sacred Heart, Volume III, 1976, Second Series, Baltimore, 1876, pp. 63-74
This monthly Bulletin of the the monthly magazine of The Apostleship of Prayer was founded in 19th century France by the Jesuits to fight the Liberalism and secularization that was ravaging nations and to return the faithful to Catholic traditional devotions, especially to the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus
|
|
|
The Catholic Trumpet: Revisiting the Catalog of SSPX Compromise |
Posted by: Stone - 04-15-2025, 06:26 AM - Forum: The Catholic Trumpet
- Replies (3)
|
 |
The Catacombs is gratefully sharing The Catholic Trumpet's revisiting and summarizing of Sean Johnson's Catalog of Compromise, Change, and Contradiction in the SSPX, first written in 2019:
Catalog of SSPX Compromise #1: New Mass – Sinful or Not?
The Catholic Trumpet [slightly reformatted] | April 9, 2025
Editor's Note: We will be posting one compromise at a time from Sean Johnson’s “Catalog of Compromise, Change, and Contradiction in the SSPX.” Though Mr. Johnson tragically continues to attend the conciliar-SSPX and defends Bishop Williamson’s scandalous position on grace in the New Mass, this does not nullify the objective facts he has documented. Truth stands on its own. And when a man who refuses to act on the truth still manages to compile a devastating record of betrayal—what excuse will you and I have if we ignore it? May these posts stir souls not to idle curiosity, but to clarity, conviction, and Catholic action. ‘Let your yes be yes, and your no be no.
#1: Change (New Mass Participation Sinful or Not?)
All the SSPX faithful should be well familiar with the little blue book, Christian Warfare, published by
the SSPX and promoted and used on their Ignatian retreats. In the section on the Examination of
Conscience, under the third commandment (page 289 in the 2006 edition) we find the following:
Have you attended and actively participated in the "New Mass"? Have you received Holy Communion in the hand?
Yet, in the new edition, this sentence was replaced with:
Have you received Holy Communion in the hand knowing that it leads to Sacrilege and loss of faith in the
Real Presence?
Have you attended and actively participated in non-Catholic religious services?
https://tradcatresist.blogspot.com/2018/...d-his.html
Clearly the SSPX no longer wishes to suggest attending the Novus Ordo is sinful.
|
|
|
Italy: Crucifix Severely Damaged, Police Pay for Restoration |
Posted by: Stone - 04-14-2025, 09:53 AM - Forum: Anti-Catholic Violence
- No Replies
|
 |
Italy: Crucifix Severely Damaged, Police Pay for Restoration
![[Image: 1nvedip40bs2otdpvdddgzboi21izlacq9b926n....89&webp=on]](https://seedeu0199.gloriatv.net/storage1/1nvedip40bs2otdpvdddgzboi21izlacq9b926n.webp?secure=gfGQbJ8GnEVfMbGUfONS3Q&expires=1744850489&webp=on)
gloria.tv | April 12, 2025
In February, a man stole a crucifix from a church on Via delle Orfanelle in Alessandria, northern Italy.
He brandished it like a weapon, swearing and spitting on it, and damaged cars along Corso Virginia Marini with it.
The perpetrator was arrested by the Carabinieri after threatening to kill them, and hitting them violently to avoid being searched by them.
The police found the crucifix badly damaged, both the wooden part of the cross and the lead part representing the body of Christ.
The perpetrator was arrested on suspicion of causing serious damage to vehicles, resisting an officer, handling stolen cultural goods, carrying offensive objects and insulting religious beliefs.
He is also accused of having threatened a minor in front of a nearby school in via Morbelli, brandishing the crucifix.
When the Carabinieri saw the crucifix on the ground in such a state, they were deeply saddened and without hesitation decided to pay for it to be repaired by a professional.
On 9 April the Crucifix was returned to the Diocese of Alessandria.
The Provincial Commander, Lieutenant-Colonel Palatini, said that "the man who stole the crucifix and used it to damage cars, threaten people and, with contempt, curse and slander it, reducing it to pieces, has wounded and insulted the community and us".
There was no information about the perpetrator [...].
|
|
|
Holy Mass in Canada [Bay Tree area] - May 2, 2025 |
Posted by: Stone - 04-14-2025, 08:27 AM - Forum: May 2025
- No Replies
|
 |
Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - Feast of St. Athanasius
First Friday
Date: Friday, May 2, 2025
Time: Confessions - 4:30 PM
Holy Mass - 5:00 PM
Location: Bay Tree, Alberta [contact coordinator below for details]
Contact: Jim 780-353-3101
|
|
|
Holy Mass in Idaho [Post Falls area] - April 30, 2025 |
Posted by: Stone - 04-12-2025, 08:51 AM - Forum: April 2025
- No Replies
|
 |
Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - Feast of St. Catherine of Siena
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Time: Confessions - 5:30 PM
Holy Mass - 6:00 PM
Location: 26485 North Silver Meadows Loop
Athol, ID 83801 [Post Falls area]
Contact: 253-509-2564
|
|
|
Holy Mass in Idaho [Pocatello area] - April 29, 2025 |
Posted by: Stone - 04-12-2025, 08:16 AM - Forum: April 2025
- No Replies
|
 |
Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - Feast of St. Peter of Verona
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Time: Confessions - 11:30 AM
Holy Mass - 12:00 PM
Location: Holiday Inn Express - Scout Mountain Room
200 Via Venitio
Pocatello, ID 83201
Contact: 208-406-7144
|
|
|
Holy Mass in California [Sacramento area] - April 28, 2025 |
Posted by: Stone - 04-12-2025, 07:54 AM - Forum: April 2025
- No Replies
|
 |
Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - Feast of St. Mark, Ap. [transferred from April 25th]
w/ Commemoration of St. Paul of the Cross
Date: Monday, April 28, 2025
Time: Confessions - 8:30 AM
Holy Mass - 9:00 AM
Location: 2404 Coolidge Way
Cordova, CA 95670 [Sacramento area]
Contact: 315-391-7575
|
|
|
|